SEO + GEO for SaaS
For SaaS teams and small groups, not only indie hackers. Ved finds the search and AI-search gap. FAQ, schema, blog, and social drafts wait in one queue. You approve.
Kavi · draftDrafted a post from your recent workNeeds you
Ved · conversationFound a relevant audience conversationNeeds you
Chanakya · after your yesScheduled an approved postShippedVed · site checkFound a content opportunityDraft ready1.0 — A week with AICMOHQ
Playing through the week.
VedVedKaviKaviChanakyaChanakyaVedKavi
ShravanVed researches your product and finds where your audience is talking. You pick the angle.
Illustrative week. Shravan cards need Studio or GTM Desk.
2.0 — Who it is for
A pure tracker is the right buy when you want that score across every answer engine. AICMOHQ is the right buy when the next step is a draft a person on the team can approve.
3.0 — Approval-first
Ved reads the site checklist and probes the answer engines you have configured, then ranks the gap.
The gap becomes an FAQ and schema article, a blog draft, or a LinkedIn or X post in the approval queue. Connected GitHub history can feed the draft.
You approve in the dashboard. The CLI and MCP can draft and edit. They cannot approve. An approved GEO article opens a GitHub pull request.
Agents can draft, edit, and schedule from the CLI, MCP, or dashboard; only a person approves, in the dashboard. Approval-first by default. Later you can let a trusted agent auto-publish, a switch you flip in the dashboard.
What ships today
Trackers win on depth of monitoring. AICMOHQ wins when the gap should become a draft in the human queue. Head-to-head pages: AICMOHQ vs Otterly, vs Profound, vs Writesonic.
| Capability | AICMOHQ today | A pure tracker |
|---|---|---|
| Who it is for | SaaS teams and small groups, including a founder who still approves every public draft. | A team that wants the score and will write the fix in another tool. |
| Track citations | ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Gemini when those engines are configured. Scheduled scans skip a score younger than 7 days. Not a daily board for AI Overviews, Copilot, Claude, or AI Mode. | This is where Otterly and Writesonic win: deeper multi-engine prompt tracking. |
| See the gap | GEO checklist for AI-crawler robots.txt (GPTBot, ClaudeBot, PerplexityBot, Google-Extended, and related crawlers), JSON-LD, llms.txt, sitemap, and thin client-rendered pages. It reports. It does not rewrite robots.txt. | Content audits and recommendations. Writesonic's public pages also describe crawler fixes. |
| Queue the fix | FAQ and JSON-LD article drafts, blog, and social posts land in one queue. You approve. An approved GEO article opens a GitHub pull request. | The report stops at a recommendation, a brief, or an action center in their product. |
| Repo and site context | Drafts use the product positioning brief. Connected GitHub history can feed them. | Usually a URL, a prompt list, or a CMS. Not a repo-native loop. |
| CLI and MCP | The aicmo CLI and MCP can draft and edit the queue. Approval stays in the dashboard. | Reporting APIs and, on some public pages, an MCP mention. Not this approval loop. |
| Prove the lift | The weekly report can read GA4 and Search Console. A before-and-after citation percent tied to UTMs is not a finished view. | The score over time is the tracker's job. Writesonic publishes this as a prove step. |
4.0 — What it costs for you
Plans, prices, and credits reflect current AICMOHQ pricing.
Compare every planVed, Kavi, ChanakyaCredits reset each billing cycle and don't roll over. Top-up packs stack on top.
SaaS companies and small teams who need search and AI-search visibility, including a technical founder who still approves the work. It is not only an indie-hacker posting loop.
Ved checks the site and the answer engines you have configured, ranks the gap, and FAQ, schema, blog, and social drafts wait in one queue. A person approves in the dashboard before anything is public.
No. Configured scans can probe ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Gemini. A scheduled scan skips a product whose score is under 7 days old. AI Overviews, AI Mode, Copilot, and Claude are not in that probe set. Otterly and Writesonic are the stronger buy when daily multi-engine depth is the job.
The GEO checklist reports AI-crawler robots rules, JSON-LD, llms.txt, sitemap, and thin client-rendered pages. The fix can be an FAQ and JSON-LD article, a blog draft, or a social post in the same approval queue, using the product brief and a connected repo. CLI and MCP can draft. They cannot approve.